I’ve been watching over social media for the last couple of decades and it has evolved an awful lot, I’ve found myself reviewing the former Twitter, now named X for an increasing amount of time. It appears to be largely uncensored, and anything goes. The question is whether the stuff that is less agreeable to some that is posted is seen by others or not. This depends entirely upon the algorithms. The stuff is there, but it may not appear or be seen by others, but it is there, and in many cases requires a lot of digging.

The subject matters that I have been reviewing of late are covering a number of areas, all of them are contentious to many normal people like myself, challenging even. Challenging is probably a better word. They are throttled back by the algos and don’t get the coverage that I’m starting to feel that they deserve.

I’ve been reading the various subjects with interest, questioning myself as to whether I am insane for even giving them time, and there are a number which appear to reaching a crescendo, that have many would ordinarily regard as bizarre claims with so much substantiating evidence that I feel I cannot ignore them any longer. Individually, a normal society member would disregard them, but when you start to put them all into one basket and overview them all, it’s made me question the reality of what I am being lead to believe by traditional information sources.

The main areas are; (list is not exhaustive, just a starting block)

Cancer – apparently easily treated, thousands of anecdotal accounts demonstrating this. Not getting media traction.

Climate Change – what is actually happening and the questionable official narrative of CO2’s role. Not getting media traction.

Energy – Physics solved decades ago, limitless clean energy – zero point energy. Not getting media traction.

Human History – Previous civilisations clearly far more advanced than credited. Not getting media traction.

Epstein – The depth of this is a rabbit hole, a very dark one, the details are chilling. Not getting media traction.

Geophysical Event – Pole shifts are starting to get more coverage. Not getting media traction.

There is so much noise out there, and I’m starting to consider that this is intentional. We are not designed for the Information Age, this has happened so quickly and has outpaced our ability to adapt to it. It can be overwhelming, all consuming. Many are caught in the headlights, stunned, unsure of the next step, more concerned with making sure that they work hard enough and cover their household bills. Meanwhile a small group of people at the top of the pile are having an absolute party.

For me, the two biggies in the list are cancer and energy. On the first, there are millions of people whose lives have been touched, destroyed or ended by it. And now, it appears all the time that it was largely treatable using a cheap and ubiquitous protocol. Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. It’s been demonstrated time and time again, yet no clinical trials. A couple have been undertaken successfully, but then retracted. Why? Money?

When this finally breaks into the mainstream consciousness, all hell is going to break loose.

Energy – it looks like the physics behind limitless power has been available for decades, but the information has been controlled by a few governments. If you have a look at the mysterious death list relating to this industry over the last couple of decades, it should sound alarm bells.

These two alone are huge. It’s time to start unpicking and investigating this entire pile. It needs to be done in a truthful, objective, a logical, linear, and unemotional manner. I’m trying to think of a term other than conspiracy that is appropriate for information that has the strong possibility of being subsequently true. One that can be applied to subjects to alert others to the possibility that the official narrative is likely flawed, or disingenuous.